課程資訊
課程名稱
基礎設施的技術政治
techno-politics of infrastructure 
開課學期
108-1 
授課對象
工學院  建築與城鄉研究所  
授課教師
王志弘 
課號
BP7186 
課程識別碼
544 M4770 
班次
 
學分
3.0 
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期五7,8,9(14:20~17:20) 
上課地點
工綜305 
備註
限碩士班以上
總人數上限:20人
外系人數限制:5人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1081BP7186_tech 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

■課程介紹:
基礎設施(infrastructure)是都市發展的條件、成果,以及象徵性展現。道路、橋梁、電訊、電力、天然氣、供水和排水等技術系統和都市服務,不僅支持著城市的順利運轉,構成都市景觀,還是社會關係與過程的環節、經濟發展和財務投資的重點,也是政治爭議及慾望投射的焦點。因此,基礎設施作為都市功能和都市形式的承載體,可說是「都市意義」(urban meaning)和運轉的重要基礎。再者,供應人類需求的基礎設施,也蘊含了人與自然的互動與共構,或者說,涉及了人類對自然資源的擷取、改造、輸送與想像。
於是,基礎設施是探討現代性、都市性、技術發展,以及人與自然之關係的重要媒介。它是生產和遞送必要物質、財貨與服務之持續流動的人造環境與過程的網絡。基礎設施的核心特質為系統、網絡、連結、循環、流動,自然也藉此轉化而與人類社會產生關連。因此,基礎設施乃社會-自然的技術複合體,構成人類生活的環境或氛圍,更是人類之社會-物質存有與流變(social-material ontology and becoming)的關鍵部分。
本課程介紹晚近國際學界有關基礎設施的新研究取向,亦即超越狹隘的工程、科技、財務和管理觀點,以政治、社會和文化為探討重點,考察基礎設施所體現的技術與社會、人類與自然、知識與實作的關係。本課程首先介紹基礎設施、現代性和技術政治等概念,然後研讀特定個案研究成果,包括核能發電、電力網、資訊基礎設施、天然氣管線、供水管線、運河、水壩、道路等。最後,本課程並延伸論及基礎設施的僵固性、基礎設施的文化再現與日常生活,以及基礎設施的失靈危機等議題。 

課程目標
■課程目標:
  本課程目標在於令修課者 (1) 掌握基礎設施之技術政治的重要理論和經驗研究成果;(2) 通過閱讀、報告、討論和實際課題研究,學習運用既有理論概念來探討基礎設施政治議題;(3) 通過實際基礎設施議題的探討和掌握,摸索與既有理論取向對話的可能性。

■適合對象:碩士班二年級以上與博士班學生。 
課程要求
■課程要求:
盡力閱讀課程材料,勇於發問,勤於出席。修習者的投入與表現,對本課程能否順利運作非常重要。本課程採取講演和討論課(seminar)並行方式,每次上課由教師講授和提示重點,並由參與者分配導讀該週的閱讀材料,每篇文章報告時間,必須控制於十五分鐘,盡量留時間發問和討論,探討能跟理論概念對話的經驗議題。報告者必須分發書面提要(必須包含三百字以內之摘述,主要論點和論證邏輯之說明【配合論證圖示】,以及評論和問題)。
沒有分配到當週閱讀材料導讀的同學,則需繳交針對某一篇或全部閱讀材料的讀書心得和提問,至少一頁。旁聽的同學,不需分配閱讀材料的導讀,也不必繳交作業,但必須每堂課繳交讀書心得與提問。
本課程的設計份量,需要修課者在課堂外花費四倍以上的時間,也就是3 X 4=12個小時,包括閱讀教材、與同學討論、撰寫摘要或讀書心得及提問的時間。
■摘要寫作要點:
書面摘要必須於首頁列明報告文獻書目(APA格式)、日期、報告人,先有三百字摘要,述明整篇文章的問題意識和主要論點。然後是經過消化的、條理分明的內容概述。換言之,不宜逐段摘譯,最好是整理出文中討論的主要問題,以及作者對這些問題的回答或爭辯,建議以圖表方式整理出主要的論證架構,也可以搭配一些圖片,譬如說作者照片、書影或文中提到的人物和事件圖片。如果直接引述文中語句或段落,必須以不同字體清楚標示,並加註頁碼。最後,必須針對文獻內容提出問題,或是可供延伸討論的經驗議題。
書面摘要和提問討論單,都要於當日下午五點以前,上傳至本課程Ceiba網頁討論區。
■作業要求與評分:
1.基礎設施民族誌:針對特定的基礎設施情境,根據細膩的觀察和訪談,撰寫一篇呈現基礎設施與日常生活之密切關係的深描,三千至五千字,佔15%。
2.期末報告:以特定都市與區域之基礎設施為主題的學術論文一篇,必須以經驗材料為基礎,運用本課程提到的概念來協助分析。該經驗現象可以位於台灣或其他國家,也可以是歷史材料。該項作業的具體題目,必須事先與教師商議,並撰寫一份期末報告計畫書,說明問題意識、相關文獻和研究方法等(約三頁)。學期中先繳交初稿,經教師批閱後,於學期最後一周繳交完稿,並準備課堂口頭報告。期末報告的規格和排版必須符合學術要求,可參照《台灣社會學刊》或《台灣社會學》的格式。完稿必須包含中英文題目、中文摘要和關鍵詞等項目;字數以一萬五千字為度。期末報告計畫書佔5%,期末報告初稿佔20%,期末報告完稿佔10%,合計35%。
4.平時表現:包含出席狀況10%、參與討論10%、課堂口頭報告與書面摘要表現30%等,合計50 %。
5.各項報告須準時繳交,遲交一天扣三分(以扣除三十分為上限),但期末報告不可遲交。繳交時間明定於各周進度中。
 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
另約時間 
指定閱讀
授課內容與進度
■閱讀材料註記 * 號者將放置於課程網頁,請自行下載。其餘材料請自行準備。閱讀材料份量將視上課情況調整。

第一週 課程介紹:何謂基礎設施? 9/13 (中秋節放假,自修)
閱讀材料
1.Harvey, Penny, Casper Bruun Jensen and Atsuro Morita (2017) Introduction: Infrastructural complications. In P. Harvey, C.B. Jensen and A. Morita (eds.), Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Companion (pp. 1-22). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.*
2.Carse, Ashley (2017) Keyword infrastructure: How a humble French engineering term shaped the modern world. In P. Harvey, C.B. Jensen and A. Morita (eds.), Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Companion (pp. 27-39). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.*
3.Larkin, Brian (2013) The Politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42: 327-343.*
4.Harvey, Penelope (2012) The topological quality of infrastructural relation: An ethnographic approach. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4/5): 76-92.*
5.Jensen, Casper Bruun and Atsuro Monita (2015) Infrastructures as ontological experiments. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 1: 81-87.*
6.林文玲(2017)〈基礎設施研究前言〉。《台灣人類學刊》15(2): 1-6。*
參考材料
1.Star, Susan Leigh (1999) The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43: 377-391.*
2.Edwards, Paul N., Steven J. Jackson, Geoffrey, C. Bowker and Robin Williams (2009) Introduction: Agenda for infrastructure studies. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(5): 364-374.*
3.Edwards, Paul N. et al. (2007) Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics, tensions and, design. Report of a Workshop on “History & Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures.*
4.Furlong, Kathryn (2010) Small technologies, big change: Rethinking infrastructure through STS and geography. Progress in Human Geography, 35(4): 460-482.*
5.Furlong, Kathryn (2014) STS beyond the “modern infrastructure ideal”: Extending theory by engaging with infrastructure challenges in the South. Technology in Society, 38: 139-147.*
6.Monstadt, Jochen (2009) Conceptualizing the political ecology of urban infrastructures: Insights from technology and urban studies. Environment and Planning A, 41(8): 1924-1942.*
7.Penny Harvey et al. (2015) Attention to infrastructure offers a welcome reconfiguration of anthropological approaches to the political. The 2015 meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory (GDAT).*
8.Penny Harvey et al (eds.) (2014) Objects and Materials: A Routledge Companion. London: Routledge.*

第二週 基礎設施、技術與現代性 9/20
閱讀材料
1.Misa, Thomas J. (2003) The compelling tangle of modernity and technology. In Thomas J. Misa, Philip Brey, and Andrew Feenberg (eds.), Modernity and Technology (pp. 1-30 ). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
2.Feenberg, Andrew (2003) Modernity theory and technology studies: Reflections on bridging the gap. In Thomas J. Misa, Philip Brey, and Andrew Feenberg (eds.), Modernity and Technology (pp. 73-104). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
3.Edwards, Paul N. (2003) Infrastructure and modernity: Force, time and social organization in the history of sociotechnical systems. In Thomas J. Misa, Philip Brey, and Andrew Feenberg (eds.), Modernity and Technology (pp. 185-225). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
4.張宏輝(2015)〈分解與組合:韋伯論技術與現代性的隱微但極具影響的觀點〉。《思與言》53(1): 53-108。*
5.賴曉黎(2013)〈技術之本質-海德格〈技術的追問〉再思考〉。《東吳哲學學報》27: 33-72。*
6.黃厚銘(2001)〈海德格的哲學思想與資訊科技〉。《資訊社會研究》1: 1-31。*
7.何函育、王志弘(2017)〈殘缺的衛生現代性或適當的綠色基礎設施?新北市污水淨化型人工濕地的生產與治理〉。《城市學學刊》8(1): 83-132。*
參考材料
1.Feenberg, Andrew (1999) Questioning Technology. London: Routledge.*
2.Feenberg, Andrew (2010) Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*(高海青譯(2015)《在理性與經驗之間:論技術與現代性》。北京:金城出版社。)
3.Soppelsa, Peter S. (2009) The Fragility of Modernity: Infrastructure and Everyday Life in Paris, 1870-1914. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of Michigan.*
4.Mitchell, Timothy (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.*
5.Minuchin, Leandro (2016) The politics of construction: Towards a theory of material articulations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(5): 895-913.*
6.王憲群(2009)〈蒸汽推動的歷史:蒸汽技術與晚清中國社會變遷(1840-1890)〉。《中央研究院近代史研究所集刊》64: 41-85。*

第三週 從大型技術系統(LTS)到技術政治 9/27
閱讀材料
1.Hughes, Thomas P. (1989) The Evolution of Large Technological Systems. In Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes and Trevor J. Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (pp. 51-82). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.(王志弘中譯:大型技術系統的演變)*
2.Winner, Langdon (2004)〈技術物有政治性嗎?〉(方俊育、林崇熙譯),收於吳嘉苓、傅大為、雷祥麟編《科技渴望社會》(pp. 123-150),台北:群學。*
3.Winner, Langdon (1993) Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values, 18(3): 362-378.*
4.Sutheerawatthana, Pitch and Takayuki Minato (2009) The relation of technology to politics in infrastructure development: The chain phenomenon and its relation to sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 17: 199-209.*
5.von Schnitzler, Antina (2013) Traveling technologies: Infrastructure, ethical regimes and the materiality of politics in South Africa. Cultural Anthropology, 28(4): 670-693.*
參考材料
1.Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas P. Hughes and Trevor J. Pinch (eds.) (1989) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
2.Hughes, Thomas Parke (1983) Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.*
3.Allen, Michael Thad and Gabrielle Hecht (eds.)(2001) Technologies of Power: Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
4.von Schnitzler, Antina (2008) Citizenship prepaid: water, calculability, and techno-politics in South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 34(4): 899-917.*
5.von Schnitzler, Antina (2014) Performing dignity: Human rights, citizenship and the techno-politics of law in South Africa. American Ethnologist, 41(2): 336-350.*
6.von Schnitzler, Antina (2016) Democracy’s Infrastructure: Techno-Politics and Protest after Apartheid. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7.Nolte, Amina (2016) Political infrastructure and the politics of infrastructure. City, 20(3): 441-454.*

第四週 法蘭西之光:二戰後的核能與國族認同;技術政治體制 10/04
閱讀材料
1.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Introduction. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 1-19). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
2.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) A technological nation. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 21-53). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
3.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Technopolitical regimes. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 55-90). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
4.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Technopolitics in the Fifth Republic. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 91-129). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
5.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Technological Unions. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 131-162). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
6.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Regimes of work. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 163-199). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
7.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Technological spectacles. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 201-240). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
8.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Atomic vintage. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 241-270). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
9.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Warring systems. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 271-323). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
10.Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) Conclusion. In The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II (pp. 325-339). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
參考材料
1.Hecht, Gabrielle (2001) Technology, politics and national identity in France. In Michael Thad Allen and Gabrielle Hecht (eds.), Technologies of Power: Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes (pp. 253-293). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
2.Hecht, Gabrielle (ed.)(2011) Entangled Geographies: Empire and Technopolitics in the Global Cold War. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
3.張國暉(2013)。〈當核能系統轉化為科技政體:冷戰下的國際政治與核能發展〉。《科技、醫療與社會》16: 103-160。*
4.Rowland , Nicholas J. and Jan-Hendrik Passoth (2015) Infrastructure and the state in science and technology studies. Social Studies of Science, 45(1): 137-145.*

第五週 社會技術轉型:多層次視角(MLP) 10/05 (10/11放假補課)
閱讀材料
1.Moss, Timothy (2014) Socio-technical change and the politics of urban infrastructure: Managing energy in Berlin between dictatorship and democracy. Urban Studies, 51(7): 1432-1448.*
2.Geels, Frank W. (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31: 1257-1274.*
3.Geels, Frank W. (2007) Transformation of large technical systems: A multilevel analysis of the Dutch highway system (1950-2000). Science Technology Human Values, 32(2): 123-149.*
4.Genus, Audley and Anne-Marie Coles (2008) Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Research Policy, 37: 1436-1445.*
5.Geels, Frank W. (2011) The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1: 24-40.*
6.Geels, Frank W. (2014) Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5): 21-40.*
參考資料
1.Geels, Frank W. (2005) Co-evolution of technology and society: the transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850–1930)—a case study in multi-level perspective. Technology in Society, 27: 363-397.*
2.Geels, Frank W. (2005) The dynamics of transitions in socio technical systems: A multi level analysis of the transition pathway from horse drawn carriages to automobiles. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(4): 445-476.*
3.Geels, Frank W. and René Kemp (2007) Dynamics in socio-technical systems Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technology in Society 29: 441-455.*
4.Geels, Frank W. and Johan Schot (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36: 399-417.*
5.Geels, Frank W. (2010) Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39: 495-510.*

第六週 都市電網的能源、權力與抗議:電力城市的地理 10/18
閱讀材料
1.Hughes, Thomas P. (2004) 美國的電氣化過程(楊佳羚、林宗德譯),吳嘉苓、傅大為、雷祥麟編《科技渴望社會》(頁19-77)。台北:群學。*
2.Babourkova, Rosalina (2016) Plovdiv: (De-)racialising electricity access? Entanglements of the material and the discursive. In Andrés Luque-Ayala and Jonathan Silver (eds.), Energy, Power and Protest on the Urban Grid: Geographies of the Electric City (pp. 45-64). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.*
3.Criqui, Laure (2016) Delhi: Questioning Urban Planning in the Electrification of Irregular Settlements. In Andrés Luque-Ayala and Jonathan Silver (eds.), Energy, Power and Protest on the Urban Grid: Geographies of the Electric City (pp. 86-111). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.*
4.Verdeil, Eric (2016) Beirut, metropolis of darkness: The politics of urban electricity grids. In Andrés Luque-Ayala and Jonathan Silver (eds.), Energy, Power and Protest on the Urban Grid: Geographies of the Electric City (pp. 45-64). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.*
5.Rutherford, Jonathan (2014) The vicissitudes of energy and climate policy in Stockholm: Politics, materiality and transition. Urban Studies, 51(7): 1449-1470.*
6.Bulkeley, Harriet, Vanesa Castán Broto and Anne Maassen (2014) Low-carbon Transitions and the Reconfiguration of Urban Infrastructure. Urban Studies, 51(7): 1471-1486.*
7.Dodson, Jago (2014) Suburbia under an Energy Transition: A Socio-technical Perspective. Urban Studies, 51(7): 1487-1505. *
參考材料
1.Luque-Ayala, Andrés and Jonathan Silver (eds.) (2016) Energy, Power and Protest on the Urban Grid: Geographies of the Electric City. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
2.Special issue articles in Urban Studies, 2014, Vol. 51, No.7. Urban energy transitions: Places, processes and politics of socio-technical change.
3.Nye, David E. (1990) Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New technology, 1880-1940. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4.Platt, Harold L. (1991) The Electric City: Energy and the Growth of the Chicago Area, 1880-1930. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
5.Desbiens, Caroline (2013) Power from the North: territory, Idebtity, and the Culture of Hydroelectricity in Quebec. Vancouver: UBC Press.
6.Needham, Andrew (2014) Power Lines: Phoenix and the Making of the Modern Southwest. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.McDonald, David A. (ed.)(2009) Electric Capitalism: Recolonising Africa on the Power Grid. Cape Town: HSRC Press.*
8.Stephens, Jennie, Elizabeth J. Wilson, and Tarla Rai Peterson (2015) Smart Grid (R)Evolution: Electric Power Struggles. New York: Cambridge University Press.*
9.Rutherford, Jonathan and Olivier Coutard (2014) Urban energy transitions: Places, processes and politics of socio-technical change. Urban Studies, 51(7) 1353–1377.*
10.Sheller, Mimi (2014) Global energy cultures of speed and lightness: Materials, mobilities and transnational power. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5): 127-154.*

第七週 碎裂都市論:網絡化基礎設施、技術移動性與都市狀況 10/25
閱讀材料
1.Graham, Stephen and Simon Marvin (2001) Introduction. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (pp. 7-36). London: Routledge.*
2.Graham, Stephen and Simon Marvin (2001) The city as sociotechnical process. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (pp. 178-216). London: Routledge.*
3.Graham, Stephen and Simon Marvin (2001) Conclusion and postscript. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (pp. 381-420). London: Routledge.*
4.Graham, Stephen (2000) Constructing premium network spaces: Reflections on infrastructure networks and contemporary urban development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(1): 183-200.*
5.Coutard, Olivier (2002) ‘Premium network spaces’: A comment. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(1): 166-174.*
6.Graham, Stephen (2002) On technology, infrastructure, and the contemporary urban condition: A response to Coutard. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(1): 175-182.*
參考材料
1.Graham, Stephen and Simon Marvin (1994) Telemetric and the convergence of urban infrastructure: Implications for contemporary cities. The Town Planning Review, 65(3): 227-242.*
2.Graham, Stephen (1994) Networking cities: Telematics in urban policy — A critical review. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 18(3): 416-432.*
3.Graham, Stephen and Simon Marvin (1996) Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places. London: Routledge.*
4.Guy, Simon, Stephen Graham, and Simon Marvin (1997) Splintering networks: Cities and technical networks in 1990s Britain. Urban Studies, 34(2): 191-216.*
5.Graham, Stephen (1997) Liberalized utilities, new technologies and urban social polarization: the UK experience. European Urban and Regional Studies, 4(2): 135-150.*
6.Graham, Stephen (2000) Introduction: Cities and infrastructure. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(1): 114-119.*
7.Graham, Stephen (2001) The spectre of the splintering metropolis. Cities, 18(6): 365-368.*
8.Graham, Stephen (2002) FlowCity: Networked mobilities and the contemporary metropolis. Journal of Urban Technology, 9(1): 1-20.*
9.Graham, Stephen (2005) Switching cities off: Urban infrastructure and US air power. City, 9(2): 169-194.*
10.Graham, Stephen (2016) Vertical: The City from Satellites to Bunkers. London: Verso.*
11.Silva, Ricardo Toledo (2000) The connectivity of infrastructure networks and the urban space of São Paulo in the 1990s. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(1): 139-164.*
12.Torrance, Morag (2008) Forging glocal governance: Urban infrastructures as networked financial products. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1): 1-21.*
13.Knox, Hannah, Mike Savage and Penny Harvey (2006) Social networks and the study of relations networks as method, metaphor and form. Economy and Society, 35(1): 113-140.*
14.Young, Douglas and Roger Keil (2010) Reconnecting the disconnected: The politics of infrastructure in the in-between city. Cities, 27: 87-95.*
15.Young, Douglas and Roger Keil (2014) Locating the urban in-between: Tracking the urban politics of infrastructure in Toronto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5): 1589-1608.*

第八週 電子/數位基礎設施;智慧城市 11/1
閱讀材料
1.Graham, Stephen (1992) Electronic infrastructures and the city: Some emerging municipal policy roles in the UK. Urban Studies, 29(5): 755-781.*
2.Graham, Stephen and Simon Guy (2002) Digital space meets urban place: Sociotechnologies of urban restructuring in downtown San Francisco. City, 6(3): 369-382.*
3.Hollands, Robert G. (2008) Will the real smart city please stand up? City, 12(3): 303-320.*
4.Krivý, Maroš (2018) Towards a critique of cybernetic urbanism_The smart city and the society of control. Planning Theory, 17(1): 8-30.*
5.Kong, Lily and Woods, Orlando (2018) The ideological alignment of smart urbanism in Singapore: Critical reflections on a political paradox. Urban Studies, 55(4): 679-701.*
6.McFarlane, Colin and Ola Söderström (2017) On alternative smart cities. City, 21(3-4): 312-328.*
7.Marvin, Simon, Andrés Luque-Ayala and Colin McFarlane (eds.)(2016) Smart Urbanism: Utopian Vision or False Dawn. London: Routldge.*
參考材料
1.Crang, Michael, Tracie Crosbie and Stephen Graham (2007) Technology, time-space and the remediation of neighbourhood life. Environment and Planning A, 39: 2405- 2422.*
2.Graham, Stephen (1998) Spaces of surveillant simulation: new technologies, digital representations, and material geographies. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 16: 483-504.*
3.Luque-ayala, Andrés and Simon Marvin (2015) Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism. Urban Studies, 52(12): 2105-2116.*
4.Neirotti, Paolo, Alberto De Marco, Anna Corinna Cagliano, Giulio Mangano, and Francesco Scorrano (2014) Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities, 38: 25-36.*
5.Datta, Ayona (2015) New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‘Entrepreneurial urbanization’ in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1): 3-22.*
6.McLean, Anthony, Harriet Bulkeley and Mike Crang (2016) Negotiating the urban smart grid: Socio-technical experimentation in the city of Austin. Urban Studies, 53(15): 3246-3263.*
7.Buck, Nick Taylor and Aidan While (2017) Competitive urbanism and the limits to smart city innovation: The UK Future Cities initiative. Urban Studies, 54(2) 501-519.*
8.Cugurullo Federico (2018) Exposing smart cities and eco-cities: Frankenstein urbanism and the sustainability challenges of the experimental city. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(1): 73-92.*
9.Lyon, David (2019) Surveillance capitalism, surveillance culture and data politics. In Bigo, D., Isin. E., and Ruppert, E. (eds), Data Politics: Worlds, Subjects, Rights. London: Routledge.*

第九週 管線政治、爭議水體 (I) 11/8
閱讀材料
1.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Introduction: Embedded infrastructures. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 1-19). Durham: Duke University Press.*
2.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Unmapping the distribution network. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 21-61). Durham: Duke University Press.*
3.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Marketizing urban development. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 62-81). Durham: Duke University Press.*
4.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Hydraulic shambles. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 82-97). Durham: Duke University Press.*
5.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Becoming a slum. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 98-127). Durham: Duke University Press.*
參考材料
一、衛生、供水與排水
1.Björkman, Lisa (2014) Becoming a slum: From municipal colony to illegal settlement in liberalization-Era Mumbai. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(1): 36-59.*
2.McFarlane, Colin (2008) Governing the contaminated city: Infrastructure and sanitation in colonial and post-colonial Bombay. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(2): 415-435.*
3.Meehan, Katie M. (2014) Tool-power: Water infrastructure as wellsprings of state power. Geoforum, 57: 215-224.*
4.Loftus, Alex and Hug March (2016) Financializing desalination: Rethinking the returns of big infrastructure. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1): 46-61.*
5.Van de Poel, Ibo (2008) The bugs eat the waste: What else is there to know: Changing professional hegemony in the design of sewage treatment plants. Social Studies of Science, 38(4): 605-634.*
6.Anand, Nikhil (2017) Hydraulic City: Water and the Infrastructures of Citizenship in Mumbai. Durham: Duke University Press.*
7.Anand, Nikhil (2012) Municipal disconnect: On abject water and its urban infrastructures. Ethnography, 13(4): 487-509.*
8.Kaika, Maria and Erik Swyngedouw (2000) Fetishizing the modern city: the phantasmagoria of urban technological networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(1): 120-138.*
9.林靖修(2017)〈基礎設施、水利社會與行動者的交織:陳有蘭溪流域Kalibuan社區共同灌溉系統建造與營運〉。《台灣人類學刊》15(2): 97-146。*
二、天然氣管線
1.Barry, Andrew (2013) Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.*
2.廖昱凱(2016)〈書評Material Politics: Disputes Along The Pipeline〉。《地理學報》80: 81-86。*
三、水壩
1.Sneddon, Christopher (2015) Concrete Revolution: Large Dams, Cold War Geopolitics, and the US Bureau of Reclamation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.*
2.Lombrado, Joseph D. (2016) The global politics of large dams: Notes on Christopher J Sneddon's Concrete Revolution. All Azimuth, 5(2): 95-102.*
四、浮稻
1.Morita, Atsuro (2017) Multispecies Infrastructure: Infrastructural Inversion and Involutionary Entanglements in the Chao Phraya Delta, Thailand. Ethnos, 82(4): 738-757.*

第十週 管線政治、爭議水體 (II) 11/15
閱讀材料
1.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Brokering water knowledge. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 128-164). Durham: Duke University Press.*
2.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Corruption. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 165-197). Durham: Duke University Press.*
3.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Power, authority, and hydraulic spectacle. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 198-226). Durham: Duke University Press.*
4.Björkman, Lisa (2015) Conclusion: Pipe politics. Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai (pp. 227-234). Durham: Duke University Press.*

第十一週 巴拿馬運河的政治、生態與基礎設施 (I) 11/22
閱讀材料
1.Carse, Ashley (2014) Introduction: The machete and the freighter. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 1-23). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
2.Carse, Ashley (2014) Monte. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 27-35). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
3.Carse, Ashley (2014) Making the Panama canal watershed. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 37-58). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
4.Carse, Ashley (2014) Frank Robinson’s map. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 59-68). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
5.Carse, Ashley (2014) Life along the river (Miocene-1903). Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 71-92). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
6.Carse, Ashley (2014) Canal construction and the politics of water. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 93-119). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
參考材料
1.Carse, Ashley (2012) Nature as infrastructure: Making and managing the Panama Canal watershed. Social Studies of Science, 42(4): 539-563.*
2.Carse, Ashley and Joshua A Lewis (2017) Toward a political ecology of infrastructure standards_ Or, how to think about ships, waterways, sediment, and communities together. Environment and Planning A, 49(1): 9-28.*
3.Maurer, Noel and Carlos Yu (2011) The Big Ditch: How America Took, Built, Ran, and Ultimately Gave Away the Panama Canal. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.*
4.何俊頤(2017)〈基礎建設:需索無度的環境〉。《科技、醫療與社會》25: 233-243。*

第十二週 巴拿馬運河的政治、生態與基礎設施 (II) 11/29
閱讀材料
1.Carse, Ashley (2014) Pueblos perdidos, or How the lake ate the river. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 121-130). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
2.Carse, Ashley (2014) The agricultural possibilities of the canal zone. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 131-156). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
3.Carse, Ashley (2014) Getting across and getting around. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 159-166). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
4.Carse, Ashley (2014) The world united, Panama divided. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 167-183). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
5.Carse, Ashley (2014) The conquest of the jungle. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 185-204). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
6.Carse, Ashley (2014) Weeds. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 207-217). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
7.Carse, Ashley (2014) A demanding environment. Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal (pp. 219-221). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*

第十三週 道路:基礎設施與專業技能的人類學 12/6
閱讀材料
1.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Introduction: Anthropology, infrastructure, and expertise. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise (pp. 1-20). Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press.*
2.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Historical futures. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise (pp. 21-51). Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press. *
3.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Integration and difference. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise (pp. 52-76). Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press. *
4.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Figures in the soil. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise (pp. 79-110). Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press. *
5.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Health and safety and the politics of safe living. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise (pp. 111-133). Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press. *
6.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Corruption and public works. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise (pp. 134-160). Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press. *
7.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Impossible publics. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise (pp. 163-185). Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press. *
8.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Conclusions: Inauguration, engineering, and the politics of infrastructural form. Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise (pp. 186-201). Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press. *
參考材料
1.Dalakoglou, Dimitris (2010) The road: An ethnography of the Albanian-Greek cross-border motorway. American Ethnologist, 37(1): 132-149.*
2.Dalakoglou, Dimitris and Penny Harvey (2012) Roads and anthropology: Ethnographic perspectives on space, time and (im)mobility. Mobilities, 7(4): 459-465.*
3.Dalakoglou, Dimitris and Penelope Harvey (eds.) (2015) Roads and Anthropology: ethnography, infrastructures, (im)mobility. London: Routledge.
4.Dalakoglou, Dimitris (2017) The road: An ethnography of (im)mobility, space, and cross-border infrastructures in the Balkans. Manchester UK: Manchester University Press.*
5.Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2012) The enchantments of infrastructure. Mobilities, 7(4): 521-536.*
6.Shove, Elizabeth, Matt Watson, and Nicola Spurling (2015) Conceptualizing connections: Energy demand, infrastructures and social practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(3): 274-287.*
7.Norton, Peter D. (2008) Fighting Traffic: The Dawn of the Motor Age in the American City. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
8.曾威誌(2012)從城牆到林蔭大道─由臺北三線道路的興建看臺北市的現代化。國立台北藝術大學建築與文化資產研究所碩士論文。*
9.Easterling, Keller (1999) Organization Space: Landscapes, Highways, and Houses in America. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
10.Graham, Stephen (2018) Elite avenues: Flyovers, freeways and the politics of urban. City,22(4): 527-550.*

第十四週 拆建城市:都市社會技術變遷的僵固性 12/13
閱讀材料
1.Hommels, Anique (2005) Obduracy in the city: Three conceptual models. Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Socio-technical Change (pp. 1-39). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
2.Hommels, Anique (2005) Attempts to chane Hoog Catharijne. Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Socio-technical Change (pp. 41-80). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
3.Hommels, Anique (2005) Trying to reconstruct the highway that cuts through Maastricht. Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Socio-technical Change (pp. 81-126). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
4.Hommels, Anique (2005) The spatial renewal of the Bijlmermeer. Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Socio-technical Change (pp. 127-172). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
5.Hommels, Anique (2005) Understanding obduracy in urban socio-technical change. Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Socio-technical Change (pp. 173-198). Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
參考材料
1.Hommels, Anique (2000) Obduracy and urban sociotechnical change: Changing Plan Hoog Catharijne. Urban Affairs Review, 35(5): 649-676.*
2.Hommels, Anique (2005) Studying obduracy in the city: Toward a productive fusion between technology studies and urban studies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(3): 323-351.*

第十五週 基礎設施的文化再現 12/20
閱讀材料
1.Davies, Dominic (2017) Introduction: Infrastructure, Resistance, Literature. In Imperial Infrastructure and Spatial Resistance in Colonial Literature, 1880-1930. (pp. 1-55). Oxford: Peter Lang.*
2.Davies, Dominic (2017) Conclusion: Towards an Infrastructural Reading of the Present. In Imperial Infrastructure and Spatial Resistance in Colonial Literature, 1880-1930. (pp. 255-263). Oxford: Peter Lang.*
3.Dominic Davies (2019) Introduction: Urban Comics: Infrastructure and the Global City in Contemporary Graphic Narratives. In Urban Comics, Infrastructure and the Global City in Contemporary Grpahic Narratives (pp. 1-46). New York: Routledge.*
4.Dominic Davies (2019) Conclusion: Bordered Forms, Bordered Worlds. In Urban Comics, Infrastructure and the Global City in Contemporary Grpahic Narratives (pp. 259-268). New York: Routledge.*
5.Boehmer, Elleke and Dominic Davies (2018) Planned Violence: Post/Colonial Urban Infrastructures, Literature and Culture. In Boehmer, E. and Davies, D. (eds), Planned Violence: Post/Colonial Urban Infrastructure, Literature & Culture (pp. 1-25). Cham, Switzerland Palgrave Macmillan.*
參考材料
1.Siemiatycki, Matti (2006) Message in a Metro_Building Urban Rail Infrastructure and Image in Delhi, India. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(2): 277-92.*
2.高嘉勵(2015)〈〈日月潭工事〉的熱帶變奏曲:帝國社會、機械文明與自然環境的對話〉。《科技、醫療與社會》21: 159-208。*
3.陳宗文(2019)〈社會學之眼:在馬內的鐵路中重新發現社會學〉。《歐美研究》49(1): 75-141。*

第十六週 基礎設施生活;人、行動、私密與活生生的基礎設施 12/27
閱讀材料
1.Amin, Ash (2014) Lively infrastructure. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(7/8): 137-161.*
2.Nguyen, Lily U. (2016) Infrastructural action in Vietnam: Inverting the techno-politics of hacking in the global South. New Media & Society, 18(4): 637-652.*
3.Simone, AbdouMaliq (2004) People as Infrastructure: Intersecting Fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture, 16(3): 407-429.*
4.Simone, AbdouMaliq (2015) Relational infrastructures in postcolonial urban worlds. In Stephen Graham and Colin McFarlane (eds.), Infrastructural Lives: Urban Infrastructure in Context (pp. 17-38). New York: Routledge.*
5.Wilson, Ara (2016) The Infrastructure of Intimacy. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 41(2): 247-280. *
6.Desai, Renu, Colin McFarlane and Stephen Graham (2015) The politics of open defecation: Informality, body, and infrastructure in Mumbai. Antipode, 47(1): 98-120.*
7.Kaika, Maria (2015) The uncanny materialities of the everyday: Domesticated nature as the invisible “other”. In Stephen Graham and Colin McFarlane (eds.), Infrastructural Lives: Urban Infrastructure in Context (pp. 139-152). New York: Routledge.*
參考材料
1.Jensen, Casper Bruun (2017) Amphibious Worlds: Environments, Infrastructures, Ontologies. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 3: 224-234.*
2.Fredericks, Rosalind (2018) Garbage Citizenship: Vital Infrastructures of Labor in Dakar, Senegal. Durham: Duke University Press.*
3.Hall, Suzanne, Julia King and Robin Finlay (2016) Migrant infrastructure: Transaction economies in Birmingham and Leicester, UK. Urban Studies, 1-17. DOI: 10.1177/0042098016634586 .*
4.Frischmann, Brett M. (2012) Infrastructure: The Social Value of Shared Resources. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.Larkin, Brian (2008) Signal and Noise: Media, Infrastructure, and Urban Culture in Nigeria. Durham: Duke University Press.*
6.Larkin, Brian (2004) Degraded Images, distorted sounds: Nigerian video and the infrastructure of piracy. Public Culture, 16(2): 289-314.*
7.McFarlane, Colin and Jonathan Rutherford (2008) Political infrastructures: Governing and experiencing the fabric of the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(2): 363-74.*

第十七週 基礎設施的允諾與失敗 1/3
閱讀材料
1.Graham, Stephen (2010) When infrastructures fail. In Stephen Graham (ed.), Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails (pp. 1-26). New York: Routledge.*
2.Little, Richard G. (2010) Managing the risk of cascading failure in complex urban infrastructures. In Stephen Graham (ed.), Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails (pp. 27-39). New York: Routledge.*
3.Luke, Timothy W. (2010) Power loss or blackout: The electricity network collapse of August 2003 in North America. In Stephen Graham (ed.), Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails (pp. 55-68). New York: Routledge.*
4.Graham, Stephen (2010) Disruption by design: Urban infrastructure and political violence. In Stephen Graham (ed.), Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails (pp. 111-129). New York: Routledge.*
5.McFarlane, Colin (2010) Infrastructure, interruption, and inequality: Urban life in the global south. In Stephen Graham (ed.), Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails (pp. 131-144). New York: Routledge.*
6.Larkin, Brian (2018) Promising forms: The political aesthetics of infrastructure. In Anand, N. Gupta, A., and Appel, H. (eds), The Promise of Infrastructure (pp. 175-202). Durham: Duke University Press.*
參考材料
1.Howe, Cymene et al. (2016) Paradoxical infrastructures: Ruins, retrofit, and risk. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(3): 547-565.*
2.Kirkpatrick, L. Owen and Michael Peter Smith (2011) The infrastructural limits to growth: Rethinking the urban growth machine in times of fiscal crisis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(3): 477-503.*
3.Gandy, Matthew (2006) Planning, anti-planning and the infrastructure crisis facing metropolitan Lagos. Urban Studies, 43(2): 371-396.*
4.Graham, Stephan and Nigel Thrift (2007) Out of order: Understanding repair and maintenance. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3): 1-25.*
5.Graham, Stephen (2003) Lessons in Urbicide. New Left Review,19: 63-77.*
6.Graham, Stephan (2004) Postmorten city: towards an urban geopolitics. City, 8(2): 165-196.*
7.Coward, Martin (2009) Network-Centric violence, critical infrastructure and the urbanization of security. Security Dialogue, 40(4–5): 399-418.*

第十八週 期末報告發表會 1/10
■繳交期末報告:修課同學準備十二分鐘的口頭報告(製作PPT),並繳交期末報告完稿。

 
參考書目
■主要教材:
Barry, Andrew (2013) Material Politics: Disputes along the Pipeline. New
York: John Wiley & Sons.*
Björkman, Lisa (2015) Pipe Politics, Contested Waters: Embedded
Infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai. Durham: Duke University Press.*
Carse, Ashley (2014) Beyond the Big Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and
Infrastructure at the Panama Canal. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
Graham, Stephen and Simon Marvin (2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked
Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London:
Routledge.*
Graham, Stephen (ed.)(2010) Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails. New
York: Routledge.*
Graham, Stephen and Colin McFarlane (eds.)(2015) Infrastructural Lives:
Urban Infrastructure in Context. New York: Routledge.
Harvey, Penny and Hannah Knox (2015) Roads: An Anthropology of
Infrastructure and Expertise. Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press.
Hecht, Gabrielle (2009) The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National
Identity after World War II. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.*
Hommels, Anique (2005) Unbuilding Cities: Obduracy in Urban Socio-technical
Change. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
Luque-Ayala, Andrés and Jonathan Silver (eds.) (2016) Energy, Power and
Protest on the Urban Grid: Geographies of the Electric City. Abingdon, Oxon:
Routledge.
Marvin, Simon, Andrés Luque-Ayala and Colin McFarlane (eds.)(2016) Smart
Urbanism: Utopian Vision or False Dawn. London: Routldge.*
Misa, Thomas J., Philip Brey, and Andrew Feenberg (eds.)(2003) Modernity and
Technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.*
Sneddon, Christopher (2015) Concrete Revolution: Large Dams, Cold War
Geopolitics, and the US Bureau of Reclamation. Chicago: The University of
Chicago Press.*
■參考書目
Allen, Michael Thad and Gabrielle Hecht (eds.)(2001) Technologies of Power:
Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes. Cambridge,
MA: The MIT Press.
Easterling, Keller (1999) Organization Space: Landscapes, Highways and
Houses in America. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Graham, Stephen and Simon Marvin (1996) Telecommunications and the City:
Electronic Spaces, Urban Places. London: Routledge.
Guy, Simon, Simon Marvin, Will Medd, and Timothy Moss (eds.)(2011) Shaping
Urban Infrastructures: Intermediaries and the Governance of Socio-Technical
Networks. London: Earthscan.
Harvey, Penny, Casper Bruun Jensen and Atsuro Morita (eds.)(2017)
Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Companion. Abingdon, Oxon:
Routledge.
Högselius, Per, Anique Hommels, Arne Kaijser and Erik van der Vleuten (eds.)
(2014) The Making of Europe's Critical Infrastructure: Common Connections
and Shared Vulnerabilities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hughes, Thomas Parke (1983) Networks of Power: Electrification in Western
Society, 1880-1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hughes, Thomas Parke (2005) Human-built World: How to Think about Technology
and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maurer, Noel and Carlos Yu (2011) The Big Ditch: How America Took, Built,
Ran, and Ultimately Gave Away the Panama Canal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Norton, Peter D. (2008) Fighting Traffic: The Dawn of the Motor Age in the
American City. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
 
No.
項目
百分比
說明
1. 
平時表現 
50% 
包含出席狀況10%、參與討論10%、課堂口頭報告與書面摘要表現30%等,合計50 %。 
2. 
期末報告 
35% 
以特定都市與區域之基礎設施為主題的學術論文一篇,必須以經驗材料為基礎,運用本課程提到的概念來協助分析。該經驗現象可以位於台灣或其他國家,也可以是歷史材料。該項作業的具體題目,必須事先與教師商議,並撰寫一份期末報告計畫書,說明問題意識、相關文獻和研究方法等(約三頁)。學期中先繳交初稿,經教師批閱後,於學期最後一周繳交完稿,並準備課堂口頭報告。期末報告的規格和排版必須符合學術要求,可參照《台灣社會學刊》或《台灣社會學》的格式。完稿必須包含中英文題目、中文摘要和關鍵詞等項目;字數以一萬五千字為度。期末報告計畫書佔5%,期末報告初稿佔20%,期末報告完稿佔10%,合計35%。 
3. 
基礎設施民族誌 
15% 
針對特定的基礎設施情境,根據細膩的觀察和訪談,撰寫一篇呈現基礎設施與日常生活之密切關係的深描,三千至五千字,佔15%。 
 
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
9/13  課程介紹:何謂基礎設施?(中秋節放假,自修) 
第2週
9/20  基礎設施、技術與現代性 
第3週
9/27  從大型技術系統(LTS)到技術政治 
第4週
10/04  法蘭西之光:二戰後的核能與國族認同;技術政治體制 
第5週
10/05  社會技術轉型;多層次視角(MLP)(10/11放假之補課) 
第6週
10/18  都市電網的能源、權力與抗議:電力城市的地理 
第7週
10/25  碎裂都市論:網絡化基礎設施、技術移動性與都市狀況 
第8週
11/01  電子/數位基礎設施;智慧城市 
第9週
11/08  管線政治、爭議水體 (I) 
第10週
11/15  管線政治、爭議水體 (II) 
第11週
11/22  巴拿馬運河的政治、生態與基礎設施 (I) 
第12週
11/29  巴拿馬運河的政治、生態與基礎設施 (II) 
第13週
12/06  道路:基礎設施與專業技能的人類學 
第14週
12/13  拆建城市:都市社會技術變遷的僵固性 
第15週
12/20  基礎設施的文化再現 
第16週
12/27  基礎設施生活;人、行動、私密與活生生的基礎設施 
第17週
1/03  基礎設施的允諾與失敗 
第18週
1/10  期末報告發表會